SEO

Has it really been eight months since the last PageRank update?

Let’s be clear what we’re talking about here: We’re not talking about “real” PageRank which regularly fluctuates and affects Google rankings, we’re talking about the green bar that comes with the Google toolbar, a score between 0 and 10 which is periodically published or ‘updated’. And it’s now been nearly eight months since the last widely reported update at the beginning of April 2010.

If you have ever heard the business idiom that “Turnover is vanity, but profit is sanity”, in the same vein, it has long been said within the SEO community that “PageRank is vanity, but conversion is sanity”.

As accountants look at turnover for one sign of a healthy business, an SEO looks at PageRank as one factor of a healthy site; Along with many other more important factors, such as building a site which search engines can read, optimising for conversions and generating profit.

In SEO it can be easy to fall into the trap of analysis paralysis, spending too much time on figures and not enough time working out issues with your site and promoting your brand. Concentrating on creating a site which users love, search spiders can access, developing your product or service to be the best it can be, creating PR for your site and striving for good quality, natural links can all be achieved without the need to check any PageRank values.

In fact, as fellow SEO Peter Handley points out it’s arguable whether it would be better if Google switched it off altogether:

Peter Handley SEO

Add to this that Google is known to show Toolbar PageRank for sites which have been penalised and can’t even pass any “real” PageRank, that new pages (in the last 8 months now) don’t show a PageRank value and can continue to accrue PageRank over the life of the page, that PageRank passed per single link is diminished by the number of links on a page, and that links on certain areas of pages such as footers and sidebars are known to pass less value than others, it becomes very difficult to establish just how effective a link will be from PageRank alone.

While there is no official statement, there are also rumours that Google may switch off the Toolbar PageRank in the future, as they believe it fuels “manipulative” and ill-advised link building practices.

Whether they do or not, we will continue to consider Toolbar PageRank values for the time being, but as a fleeting measurement with a fistful of salt.

Tags: , ,

1 comments Add This

Google Instant – The Death of SEO?

When Google CEO Eric Schmidt Tweeted “I predict big things happening today at Google. We’re already fast.. fast is about to get faster.” it was clear that something big was on the horizon. Following that, Google held a high profile press conference in San Francisco to announce ‘Instant Search’, a significant change to the way Google handles queries and the latest of their search innovations. They explained that while users type relatively slowly, they can scan text relatively quickly and that as a result ‘Instant’ search should lead to a faster user experience, certainly with more organic impressions, and potentially with more PPC impressions.

“Google Instant” is now live for visitors to Google.com who are in the U.S. and is also live for users who are logged into a Google Account in a few other countries, including the UK. Search results appear as a user types, updating in real time to match the query based on each additional letter. As the results change, the search suggestions recommended by Google are also updated, channelling users towards a set of suggested keywords. Together, these features could have a significant impact on advertisers, who will see a shift in user behaviour as a result of users becoming accustomed to this new way of searching.

For now, this will have no effect on Google search partner sites, mobile searches or browser toolbar searches for the moment, which make up a reasonable amount of searches. Chitika, a web analytics company estimates that 9% of all searches are completed through the default Firefox toolbar and custom Google homepage, which is not currently affected. Google has said that mobile searches will have Google Instant in the future, and a successful rollout would probably mean that more searches will be included in Google Instant going forward.

A major change in the way an ‘impression’ is counted will have some impact on figures reported by Google Webmaster Tools and Google AdWords. Traditionally, an impression is incurred each time a user clicks on a suggested search option or presses return. With Google Instant, impressions are also accrued when a user pauses on a set of results for three or more seconds, or clicks on a result as they appear while a user types.

In considering how Google Instant will play out, it is worth noting that Google doesn’t always get it right. When Google recently promoted their homepage backgrounds, such was the underestimation of the dislike for the new ‘feature’ that Google was not prepared for the backlash of disgruntled users. Not only this, but other products and services have failed to deliver, notably in the social arena where ‘Google Wave’ and ‘Google Buzz’ were not well received by the online community. So it may be that this radical change may not be so well received, and may not be a permanent feature.

Of course, there is a way to disable ‘instant’ search, by using the prominent drop down menu to the right of the main search box, and it remains to be seen how many users will disable this feature.

How to switch Google Instant off

Below is an image of the drop down box to the right of the main search box, select ‘Off (Press Enter to Search)’ to disable Google Instant.

How to disable Google instant

How will this impact your SEO campaign?

Also, if you have a rounded SEO strategy working in tune with a believable brand, this may not be a bad thing at all, as higher quality results should surface due to a higher accuracy and a more relevant search experience. However, as results change strategies will need to be reviewed to ensure meeting up to the minute best practice. For example, keyword research will need to include consideration of Instant.

This should in theory reduce the number of impressions from repeated queries as users can now adjust their query readily without clicking through results, reducing or increasing the number of visits from short and long tail queries depending on how specific the results are from any given query.

How about PPC?

PPC Will certainly be affected by this update, as users can scan more results without clicking, and three second results, where ads are shown before a query is completed will increase impressions for Ads.

Keyword research should now include consideration for shortened versions of queries, including negative keywords for words which have different meanings in shortened versions.

So potentially higher impressions to be had but from a potentially reduced set of keywords as users are channelled to their goal by more relevant results. Remember also that this is from the same group of users, so the Cost Per Click (CPC) price also looks set to increase as a result of these changes.

Oh, and in case you are wondering – For now, SEO is not dead ;)

Tags: , , , ,

3 comments Share

Search engines still struggling with Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs)

Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) are now a reality and in use by websites right now. Unfortunately, it seems that the search engines are still playing catch-up.

Skip to start of post

Introduction

Note: If you are unable to view the Arabic and Cyrillic letters in this page you may need to install the required fonts.

Now that the first Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) have gone live and have had some time to get established, it seems like a good time to revisit the finding of my previous article on IDNs “Can search engines handle Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs)?

IDNs went live initially for three countries, all using the Arabic alphabet: Egypt (مصر); Saudi Arabia (السعودية); and the United Arab Emirates (امارات). Russia’s new IDN (рф) went live a little later, adding the Cyrillic alphabet to the mix, and additional IDNs have been created for other countries and alphabets. For this article I’ll take a look at how search engines handle these four IDNs.

To get an idea of how extensively the search engines have indexed sites on these new IDNs I’m going to use the “site:” operator. Although this operator is primarily used for finding pages on a particular website, e.g. [site:lbi.co.uk] it can also work all the way up to the TLD level, e.g. [site:uk].

Searching Google for [site:مصر], [site: السعودية], [site:امارات] and [site:рф] returns results from the IDNs  for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Russia as expected. Whilst the new IDN for Saudi Arabia only had 14 pages indexed when checked, the other IDNs all feature thousands of results.

Screenshot of a search for [site:рф] in Google:

Google search for site:рф

Trying the same searches in Bing, however, does not return any results:

Bing search for site:рф

It appears that the site: operator does not work with these new IDNs in Bing (searching for other domains, e.g. [site:com], works as expected).

IDNs in search results?

The next area tested is whether the search engines will return these domains in their search results. To test this I picked out some random web pages on the new Egyptian IDN and tried searching for their title tags in both Google and Bing.

Searching both Google and Bing for the title of one web page, [مراكز التميز في البحث والتطوير - وزارة الإتصالات], brought up a number of web pages. The results from Google and Bing both contained a result from an IDN:

Google snippet featuring an IDN:

Google snippet featuring an Arabic IDN

Bing snippet featuring an IDN:

Bing snippet featuring an Arabic IDN

More IDN bugs

Earlier I described how Bing’s site: operator does not yet work with IDNs. However, Google also has a number of IDN woes. Searching for [site:مصر] (the new IDN for Egypt) brings up the site سجل.مصر – however, clicking on the “Show more results from سجل.مصر” link in Google appears to be listing sites on domains other than سجل.مصر. Additionally, the “Show all results” link is percent encoded rather than listing the site name in the Arabic font.

Screenshot of Google IDN bug

In my previous look at how search engines handled IDNs I had found that Google’s links to “Translate this page” and “Cached” were broken for IDNs. Today it appears that Google has fixed the translation links – however, the cache links still do not appear to function.

Conclusion

The situation is much the same as it was back in February. The search engines can index websites which use IDNs – however, all of the major search engines still have bugs with their IDN support.

Given that the number of IDNs is set to grow and the number of websites using IDNs is likely to vastly increase in the near future, it’s vital that the search engines iron out the bugs in their IDN support. After all, if a search engine can’t handle websites from a particular properly, people might decide to switch to a search engine that can.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

0 comments Share

Bing now powering Yahoo! results in the US & Canada

Bing Yahoo! Logo
Yahoo! is dead, long live Yahoo!

The “Binghoo” search alliance is finally coming to fruition. After some initial testing Yahoo! and Bing have announced that Yahoo! has completed the Bing transition and its search results are now being powered entirely by Bing.

This initial rollout only covers the US and the English-language version of Yahoo! in Canada, with other countries set to follow. Given the relative maturity of Bing in the UK compared to many other countries we would be surprised if the next rollout didn’t include the UK, although when this will happen is anyone’s guess. Yahoo! has said that the full worldwide rollout may be as late as 2012.

One country that might not be transitioning to Bing-Powered Yahoo! is Japan – the one country in the world where Yahoo! is a market leader. Yahoo! Japan is only partially owned by Yahoo! and has said that it is planning to use Google to power its search results instead of Bing, a move which Microsoft has slammed as anti-competitive.

Tags: , , , , , ,

0 comments Share

London Guathon DDD Event

Last Friday I had the good fortune (as well as good friends who did the booking for me) to attend London Guathon DDD event. This was a free community event hosted by Microsoft to reveal their latest technology roadmaps and strategies. Within the geek community these event tickets are  as prized as the golden ones within Wonka  Bars with all 240 places being filled in less than 20min.

Despite being late due to the Runaway tube train  and the Northern line being closed I managed to get to the Odeon in Covent Garden just on time (OK, I was 15 minutes late, but the session started 15 minutes after I arrived).

ScottGu in London Guathon DDD

ScottGu in London Guathon DDD

Scott Guthrie opened up the event with an introduction to the sessions of the day. These sessions spanned four different aspects of Microsoft’s new technologies:

  1. VS 2010 and ASP.NET 4
  2. ASP.NET MVC 2
  3. Windows Phone 7 Development
  4. Web Development Futures: ASP.NET MVC 3, SQL CE and IIS Express

What was cool?

First session had many tips and tricks from Scott ‘Gu’ including some which are guaranteed to make the geeks squeal with delight.
The second session was the real meat in the sandwich for those who care about content and the way it is presented. For the past 10 years, ASP.Net was a great platform in terms of development productivity and for building enterprise applications. But its weakness was in the poor quality front-end code it generated; something that LBi interface developers and SEO consultants constantly complained about. However, Microsoft’s new ASP.NET MVC will be a game changer in this part (there are useful packages in IIS 7 to help on the SEO side.)

And yes, Windows Phone 7 will be released around October in UK. Microsoft intends to send a strong statement of intent to the smart phones market. Mike Ormond’s slides on the day can be found here.

And finally, In the last session on Web futures Scott Gu announced new technologies including IIS Express, MVC3, code-first Entity Framework, Razor (the new view engine for ASP.NET) that is going to be released soon by Microsoft. Then he discussed the common themes of these new developments which are to keep the existing technologies working better and cleaner and to enable extensibility and customization.

Revolutionary… No, but Microsoft are moving in the right direction whilst correcting some of the legacy issues of .Net. Who knows one day we may be able to have more than one form again…

Microsoft continue to pick up many of the good ideas that have been implemented in other languages for a little while and we’re starting to see some real productivity improvements as a consequence. However Microsoft remains a big beast and how these developments relate to the Sharepoints and Silverlights of the world remains to be seen. Refinement rather than reinvention is definitely order of the day for Microsoft and for that they should be commended.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments Share

Follow us on:

Tweet Tweet