acquisitions

Bing now powering Yahoo! results in the US & Canada

Bing Yahoo! Logo
Yahoo! is dead, long live Yahoo!

The “Binghoo” search alliance is finally coming to fruition. After some initial testing Yahoo! and Bing have announced that Yahoo! has completed the Bing transition and its search results are now being powered entirely by Bing.

This initial rollout only covers the US and the English-language version of Yahoo! in Canada, with other countries set to follow. Given the relative maturity of Bing in the UK compared to many other countries we would be surprised if the next rollout didn’t include the UK, although when this will happen is anyone’s guess. Yahoo! has said that the full worldwide rollout may be as late as 2012.

One country that might not be transitioning to Bing-Powered Yahoo! is Japan – the one country in the world where Yahoo! is a market leader. Yahoo! Japan is only partially owned by Yahoo! and has said that it is planning to use Google to power its search results instead of Bing, a move which Microsoft has slammed as anti-competitive.

Tags: , , , , , ,

0 comments Add This

Yahoo! – Microsoft search deal approved and imminent

The Yahoo! – Microsoft deal has now been passed by the European Commission, paving the way for it to be implemented within the “next few days” according to an official press release.

Yesterday, Microsoft and Yahoo! announced the outcome of the European Commission’s ruling on the search deal. Regulators in the US, Australia, Brazil and Canada have all approved the deal, which still requires formal approval in other jurisdictions including Korea, Taiwan and Japan. The Yahoo! press release states that the European ruling will see the deal being implemented within "the next few days", with Yahoo! becoming the

“exclusive relationship sales force for both companies’ premium search advertisers globally”.

The press release goes on to explain the deal as follows:

“Under terms of the agreement, which was announced in late July 2009, Microsoft will provide Yahoo! with the same search result listings available through Bing, and Yahoo! will innovate around those listings by integrating rich Yahoo! content, enhanced listings with conveniently organized information about key topics, and tools to tailor the experience for Yahoo! users.

Yahoo! will focus on providing a compelling and innovative search experience that allows people to find and explore the things, people and sites that matter most to them. While Microsoft will provide the underlying platform, both companies will continue to create different, compelling and evolving experiences, competing for audience, engagement and clicks.”

Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO summed the deal up by stating:

“I believe that together, Microsoft and Yahoo! will promote more choice, better value and greater innovation to our customers as well as to advertisers and publishers.”

The deal’s approval was largely expected by those in the industry, with the consensus being that Yahoo! and Microsoft together can compete more effectively with Google in order to prevent it from becoming an entirely dominant force. Further details about the deal can be found at searchalliance.com.

Tags: , , , , , ,

0 comments Share

Are we losing two of the top four search engines?

Bing and Yahoo! have agreed a deal which will essentially kill off the Yahoo! search engine and merge its technology with Bing’s. At the same time, we have discovered that Ask Jeeves has been serving Google-crawled pages. Are we going to lose half of the top four search engines?

The recently announced deal between Bing and Yahoo! will essentially kill off the Yahoo! search engine – the search results on Yahoo! will be served by Bing, and Microsoft gets Yahoo!’s search technology. This means that the number two and number three search engines will (pending regulatory approval of the deal) become a single search engine.

At the same time, we recently discovered that the number four search engine, Ask Jeeves, appears to be showing web pages which were provided in some way by Google.

So are the "big four" set to become just the "big two"? What would this do to the search marketplace?

Make no mistake about it – the consolidation of search engines is bad for site owners. Instead of having multiple search engines where you have a chance of ranking for your keywords, you will have only two. You’ll either get lots of traffic, or almost none, and swings in web traffic will become more severe.

As you can see, homogenous ecosystems are not healthy environments in which to live. Unfortunately, to an extent, this is what we already have, as Google has such great dominance in the search world. In an ideal world, there would be no dominant search engine, just lots of smaller ones with market shares of no more than 20-30%.

Tags: , , , , ,

2 comments Share

Microsoft and Yahoo Deal Official

Microsoft and Yahoo! have announced a deal that changes the search landscape considerably.

Microsoft and Yahoo! have announced a deal that changes the search landscape considerably. In a press release from Microsoft, the Redmond company has said that it has reached an agreement with Yahoo!

"…that will improve the Web search experience for users and advertisers, and deliver sustained innovation to the industry. In simple terms, Microsoft will now power Yahoo! search while Yahoo! will become the exclusive worldwide relationship sales force for both companies’ premium search advertisers."

So the long ‘will they/won’t they’ story comes to an end. It started back in February 2008, when Microsoft made a proposal for the acquisition of Yahoo! and has been in and out of the search industry news since then.

How close would this move "Yahbing!" to Google? Not that close. The Wall Street Journal in an earlier post, mentioned that comScore places a combined Yahoo! and Microsoft search at less than half of Google’s 65% share of the U.S. market. But the point here is that this will be an awful lot closer than Bing and Yahoo!’s current individual shares.

A new website "Choice. Value. Innovation" has been constructed to cover the deal. It lists the key terms of the agreement which includes the following clauses.

  • The term of the agreement is 10 years
  • The agreement gives Microsoft a 10 year licence to Yahoo!’s core search technologies enabling Microsoft to integrate Yahoo! search technologies into existing web search platforms.
  • Bing will be the exclusive algorithmic search and paid search platform for Yahoo! sites while Yahoo! will continue to use its own technology and data in other areas of its business such as display advertising technology.
  • Yahoo! will become the exclusive worldwide relationship sales force for both companies ’ premium search advertisers.
  • Full implementation is expected to occur within 24 months following regulatory approval.

Importantly for both companies the agreement doesn’t cover other web properties and products such as email, instant messaging, display advertising or any other aspect of the companies’ businesses.

Will it beat Google? Difficult to say. In my opinion the biggest hurdle for anyone taking on Google is basically changing a "habit" that millions of people have got into. I don’t think many people who use Google use it because they think it is a better search engine per se (and I always think that here relevancy is in the eye of the beholder) but think that they do so because they are "used to" using Google. That is, I’ll admit, a sweeping statement.

What I hope it will do is to benefit the search user. The deal could at last give Google some serious competition and that has to be good for everyone.

See our follow-up post: Are we losing two of the top four search engines?

Tags: , , ,

0 comments Share

Will Google buy Valve?

Rumours are going round that Google might buy Valve, and through it acquire the leading games distribution platform, Steam. What would this mean for the industry?

Everyone’s favourite source of tech-industry speculation, The Inquirer, claims to have inside information that Google is about to buy Valve. Although not always on the money, The Inquirer have broken some of the most sensational news in the tech industry (such as AMD buying ATI), so it firmly falls under a definite maybe.

The suggestion has taken many by surprise, but in hindsight, we’re kicking ourselves for not having thought about it before now. A tie up makes more sense than you might realise.

Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful (and fill it with targeted advertising of course!) This definitely includes games – only last year Google appeared at the Casual Connect game convention in Seattle and spoke of their plans for “AdSense for Games”. Microsoft are already working in this area, having bought in-game advertising company Massive Inc. in 2006. Microsoft also, of course, created and own the Xbox platform.

Valve became famous for developing gaming blockbuster Half-Life, but it’s their games distribution platform called Steam – by far the most successful in the industry and with over 15 million accounts – that would be key to interest from Google. Valve has said only last month that they would be happy to be bought.

Here are some potential areas where the two could work together;

Firstly, and most obviously, is AdSense for Games. Google would instantly have a commanding position in PC games distribution, putting them in an ideal situation to get talking to games developers about using Google for their in-game advertising.

This in-game advertising could be anything from ads on in-game billboards to product placement (e.g. Coca Cola cans in in-game vending machines or Nike branding on in-game characters), and many, many other forms people haven’t even thought of yet (for inspiration, see what Ikea did with the Sims). This is still a nascent industry, one with massive potential for growth (Google’s Bernie Stolar said last year Google is involved in in-game advertising … This is an area that Google believes will have tremendous growth over the next number of years.

 

In-game advertising is also something that wouldn’t have been possible only a short time ago, when always-on connections were less widespread (if your in-game ads never change, then the ads your game ships with are only a one-off source of revenue).

In-game advertising has greater potential than simply making games publishers a bit more money for their games – like advertising on websites, and in print and other forms of media before it, it will also open up entirely new business models, where the advertising pays for the content.

Many games could in the future be distributed for free and be supported financially by some form of advertising. This is unlikely to work for all types of games – the longer the users plays the game for, the more ads can be shown and the more money can be made. Therefore this is likely to work best for multi-player games, although there are some forms of single-player games which can keep attention for a longer period of time (such as the Sims). Expect an explosion in low-budget advertising-supported games too.

So, aside from in-game advertising on PC games, what else is there? Well, there’s the possibility of advertising within the Steam client itself, although we wouldn’t expect too much revenue from this compared to other channels. There’s also potential for tying in searches for games on in Google web or product search with direct download links.

The other big potential tie-up is with mobile gaming – some of the biggest complaints about games for mobile phones have been the small screen size and lack of compatibility across many phone models. Google Android could solve both of those, with minimum requirements (including a minimum screen size) which could be used as a basis for game developers to target. Google could act both as a distributor of mobile games, and could also apply the same in-game advertising principles that it will apply to PC gaming.

Gaming is an exploding market. Recent studies found that 97% of young Americans (including females) play video games, but studies are reporting growth in pretty much all demographics. It’s not just 16-29 year-old males who play games any more! This is a massive market… and also a rich source of data for producing targeted adverts. You paused to look at that flashy ad on a billboard while blasting your way through City 17? Look out for it on the next website you visit which uses AdSense. Picked out a nice coffee machine for your house in the Sims? Guess what’ll greet you in the ads next time you search for coffee-related queries on Google.

Piracy is one of the many challenges the games industry faces, particularly for the PC games industry, and digital distribution is proving to be one of the more successful ways in getting around this (another being subscription-based online games like World of Warcraft). Supporting games development with advertising makes a lot of these problems go away, or at least reduces their impact.

One thing in question is what Google might do with the games development side of Valve – that might sit too far outside of their business model. If Google do buy Valve, I certainly wouldn’t be surprised to see Steam itself kept and the Valve games development department sold off (and I don’t doubt that there would be many interested buyers).

Make no mistake, this rumour – and it is still just a rumour – would be a huge gamble for Google to take. It would be an audacious (and completely unexpected) move, but it makes a lot of sense on numerous levels.

Some food for thought – last year Google also said We are not going to be a publisher or a developer or a portal for games. Well, don’t forget,
there is no gPhone and Eric Schmidt’s statement We are not building a browser.

Tags: , ,

0 comments Share