microformats

Video Optimisation

In this post in our series covering frequently asked questions, we are going to look at optimising video for search.

Faster internet connections have meant that video is a viable option everywhere on the web.

The top three search engines all now include video as part of their main results. Including video can benefit a website and its users in a variety of ways.

However, for video to be effective from an SEO point of view, it needs to be correctly optimised for search. Video content, like images, cannot be “seen” by search engine spiders. Therefore, if a video contains information that is important for the ranking of the page, your site needs to be optimised to point the search engines to the video content. This, in turn, will make it easier for users to find your video in the search engines.

Ideally, before you even make the video, you should make a list of the keywords that you want to target. The video meta data should target these keywords and, at the very least, the title, description, keywords, category, duration and a suitable thumbnail should be included.

There are two main types of meta data that can be employed: XML feeds and HTML markup.

For XML feeds, we generally recommend using Media RSS rather than Video Sitemaps, as the Media RSS format is more widely supported.

For HTML markup you can use either the Facebook Share format or the SearchMonkey RDFa  format. The advantage of using HTML markup is that it may result in your site getting enhanced snippets in the search engines. However, we recommend using both an XML format and an HTML format, as different web services will support different formats.

Each video should have its own page, which should be optimised for keywords relating to the video. This would include titles, headings and meta data. We also recommend adding a summary of the video, which includes these keywords. Both the URL of the page embedding the video and the video file itself should be descriptive and should also include the most important keywords. Another useful addition is a video transcript, which is beneficial for both accessibility and SEO. This transcript can be included on the page in which the video is embedded, in addition to (or in place of) the summary.

The length of the video can also be very important. Short videos are generally better received than long videos. If a longer video is necessary, consider breaking it up into multiple smaller clips or episodes. This will work better for some videos than others – you don’t want to break up a feature film, but creating a series of informational videos that each answer a different question well is often better than creating  a long sprawling video about the entire topic. Web users are known not to be very patient when waiting for videos to buffer. In fact, research by TubeMogul showed that 81% of online video viewers clicked away if a clip rebuffered, so shorter segments are more likely to be watched.

The final important issues to consider are how to host and distribute your online video – we will cover these topics in a separate article next week.

Tags: , , , , ,

0 comments Add This

Google supports Facebook Share & SearchMonkey video formats

Google has announced that it now supports the Facebook Share and SearchMonkey RDFa formats for video, allowing site owners to tell Google about videos using simple HTML markup.

Google has announced that it now supports the Facebook Share and Yahoo! SearchMonkey RDFa for video formats. These formats allow site owners to submit their videos for inclusion into Google Video Search and, more importantly, into Google’s main search results as well via Universal Search.

Google already supports two formats for submitting videos – its own Video Sitemaps format and the MediaRSS format. However, these two newly supported formats are different in nature – Video Sitemaps and MediaRSS are XML feed based formats, whereas these two newly supported formats are embedded into HTML pages like microformats using standard HTML markup.

It’s not yet clear whether Google will be only be using these additional formats as another method for discovering videos for Video search or whether they will also be using them to generate Rich Snippets for web pages that include them. I have tested Google’s Rich Snippets Testing Tool with a few web pages which embed videos using the Facebook Share format and it doesn’t appear to recognise them, although it’s possible that the tool has simply not been updated yet. We will have to wait and see.

It’s good to see co-operation on standards by the search engines – Yahoo! also supports Facebook’s format (as does Facebook of course). The sheer number of different standards might potentially be an area of concern, however. Although having both XML and HTML formats makes sense, there are now two competing XML formats and two competing HTML formats. It seems that, for now, the search engines want to let the market decide, and it’s entirely possible that formats which don’t see widespread adoption will see support dropped further down the line.

Exactly how these HTML-based formats will fit with the previously supported XML-based ones has yet to be seen – however, at the moment there is nothing to suggest that they should instantly replace the XML types. It seems rather likely that the two types of formats will be complementary rather than competitive – there’s no reason not to use both HTML formats embedded within web pages and separate XML feeds. Different web services will support different formats, and using both may increase the chances of discovery.

Tags: , , ,

0 comments Share

Monkeying about with search

Yahoo! has launched its new SearchMonkey open development platform. How will this affect how search results are shown to the world? Read on…

SearchMonkey was launched last week by Yahoo! and believe it or not, the monkey may be the future. The idea is to give site owners the opportunity to control how their website shows up on the Yahoo! search result page.

This is an interesting development because instead of just a dull text listing you can virtually turn the Yahoo! results page into a billboard for your site! Plus, aesthetics aside, an attractive image and some important links may help you increase traffic flow into your lovingly crafted site.

Creating this is fairly straightforward as the monkey supports multiple formats, including RDFa, eRDF, and various API’s (such as OpenSearch) and XML feeds. In addition to this, third party developers can now create applications that can be launched from the search result. For instance, an infobar could be placed in your search engine result which, when clicked on, will show additional data in-line on the search page.

Swing on over here to find out more.

Tags: , ,

0 comments Share